Is Kalshi legal?
Is Kalshi Legal in Washington State? What's Off
By Owen Monagan ·
Since September 2, 2026, a King County Superior Court order has required Kalshi to block sports, elections and five other kinds of market for anyone in Washington State. Its finance, economics, climate and commodities markets are still available. Kalshi isn't banned outright: the order is a preliminary injunction, and it lets you exit positions you already hold and withdraw your money.
Can I still use Kalshi in Washington State?
Washington · as of Sep 22, 2026
Kalshi is switched off in Washington for 7 of 12 market categories, since Sep 2, 2026.
Seven of Kalshi's twelve categories are switched off, sports and elections among them. The order lets finance, economics, climate and commodities keep trading, and doesn't say whether crypto is covered.
Can I withdraw my money from Kalshi in Washington State?
- Withdraw your cash: allowed. Nothing in the order stops you closing your account and withdrawing your cash.
“Nothing in the Order shall prohibit Kalshi from allowing Washington, identified or self-reported consumers to close or deactivate their Kalshi accounts and withdraw funds.”
Primary source: King County Superior Court (Judge John McHale), Aug 12, 2026 · p.14, ll.24–26 - Close open positions: allowed. Kalshi can't stop you exiting positions you already hold.
“Kalshi will not prohibit users from exiting positions they already hold.”
Primary source: King County Superior Court (Judge John McHale), Aug 12, 2026 · p.13, ll.19–20 - New trades: blocked. No new trades in the seven switched-off categories for anyone located in Washington (GeoComply geofence since Sep 2).
“designed to prevent anyone located within the geographic boundaries of the State of Washington from purchasing any event contract”
Primary source: King County Superior Court (Judge John McHale), Aug 12, 2026 · p.13, ll.14–19 - Deposits: not addressed. The order doesn't say anything about deposits. Primary source: King County Superior Court (Judge John McHale), Aug 12, 2026
- Money back to users: left open. The state kept the right to seek back fees and losses Washington users took from Sep 2 on. Nothing has been ordered.
“The State reserves, and does not waive, the right to seek recovery for fees and losses incurred by Washington consumers on or after September 2, 2026.”
Primary source: King County Superior Court (Judge John McHale), Aug 12, 2026 · p.13, ll.20–22
How money on Kalshi is protected, wherever you are
- Kalshi's clearinghouse, Kalshi Klear, has been registered with the CFTC as a derivatives clearing organization since August 2024. Primary source
- Kalshi Klear's rules require money you deposit directly to be kept separate from its own money, and never mixed with it. Primary source: R7.7F, R7.9C
- SIPC doesn't cover prediction-market accounts. It excludes commodity futures. Primary source
- Kalshi Klear uses a bank sweep meant to add FDIC coverage, but Kalshi's own agreement says that coverage is not guaranteed to you. Primary source: §IV
- Kalshi Klear's rules say withdrawals are processed by the next bank business day, and they make no exception for state restrictions. Primary source: R6.4C
What Washington State is asking the court to order against Kalshi
- StopHalt Kalshi's gambling activity in Washington. Primary source
- Money back to usersRecover the money Washington users lost. Primary source
- PenaltiesCivil penalties under the Consumer Protection Act. Primary source
A state court finding that Kalshi likely breaks state gambling law isn't a ruling on how your trades are taxed. Federal tax treatment is a question under the Internal Revenue Code, and no court or IRS guidance has settled it for event contracts. How to file a Kalshi year.
Which Kalshi markets still work in Washington State?
- SportsOff
- ElectionsOff
- PoliticsOff
- EntertainmentOff
- CultureOff
- Tech and scienceOff
- MentionsOff
- Crypto?
- EconomicsTrading
- FinanceTrading
- ClimateTrading
- CommoditiesTrading
Off: an order blocks it. Trading: an order expressly allows it. ?: the order's text doesn't settle it.
Crypto: Crypto is one of Kalshi's tabs the order describes, but it's in neither the banned list nor the carve-out.
Is Kalshi banned in Washington State? Every ruling, in order
Not outright: 7 of 12 Kalshi market categories are switched off in Washington under a court order since Sep 2, 2026.
Rulings so far: Washington 6, Kalshi 0
14 steps, Dec 9, 2025 to Aug 10, 2026
- · Washington State Gambling Commission
The Washington State Gambling Commission issued guidance that offering event-based contracts or participating in these markets 'is not authorized in Washington State.'
This fills in the exact date for your December 2025 entry. A press-release PDF is also at https://wsgc.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2025-12/Predition%20Markets%20Press%20release.pdf
- · King County Superior Court
Washington's attorney general sued Kalshi in King County Superior Court under the Gambling Act and the Consumer Protection Act.
- · U.S. District Court, W.D. Wash.
Kalshi removed the AG's case (King County No. 26-2-10264-3 SEA) to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington on the same day it was filed (No. 2:26-cv-01062).
The AG complaint PDF is named 20260327. An older note in our repo that says 3/28 is wrong.
- · U.S. District Court, W.D. Wash.
Robinhood Derivatives sued Washington officials in federal court seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against enforcement of state gambling law (No. 3:26-cv-05311).
CORRECTION: filed March 30, not April. The case is before Judge Coughenour and has been stayed since May 21, 2026 (next step below).
- · U.S. District Court, W.D. Wash.
A federal judge (Coughenour) sent the case back to state court: gambling is a state matter.
- · U.S. District Court, W.D. Wash. / Ninth Circuit
Kalshi appealed the remand order to the Ninth Circuit (No. 26-3106) and asked the district court to stay remand.
The docket confirms your existing dates: remand ordered 5/5 (effective 14 days later), Ninth Circuit denied the stay 5/21 (ECF 31), and the case file went back to King County 5/22.
- · Ninth Circuit
The Ninth Circuit refused to pause the return to state court.
- · U.S. District Court, W.D. Wash.
Washington agreed not to enforce its gambling laws against Robinhood's role in event-contract trading until the Ninth Circuit decides the Nevada appeals, and Judge Coughenour stayed Robinhood's case.
Primary source: p.3, ll.1–8Primary source: p.5 (order entered May 21, 2026)
- · Washington Court of Appeals
Kalshi appealed the preliminary injunction to the Washington Court of Appeals.
Exact date not found. GeekWire's 8/10 docket check says Kalshi had already appealed. The Law360 7/27 headline ('pending appeal') suggests it was filed by late July. Neal Katyal now appears for Kalshi.
- · King County Superior Court
King County Superior Court heard the state's motion for a preliminary injunction.
- · King County Superior Court
The preliminary injunction was filed (signed 7/17). Judge McHale rejected Kalshi's federal-preemption defence and set the operating terms for a later order.
CLARIFICATION: the e-signature page says 'Date Signed: 07/17/2026' and the stamp says filed 2026 JUL 20 09:00 AM. The order says the court would issue specific terms by 8/5 and asked for the parties' terms by noon 8/3. Only a records-preservation clause took effect immediately.
- · King County Superior Court
Kalshi asked Judge McHale to stay the preliminary injunction pending appeal.
7/27 is the article date. The motion may have been filed on or shortly before it.
- · U.S. District Court, W.D. Wash.
Ludlow Exchange LLC, a Novig affiliate, sued Washington officials in federal court over enforcement of state gambling law (No. 3:26-cv-05888).
This is not a Kalshi action. It is another competitor's pre-emptive suit, like OG's. No enforcement stipulation appears on its docket so far.
- · Washington Court of Appeals (commissioner)
A Washington Court of Appeals commissioner denied Kalshi's emergency motion to stay the preliminary injunction.
This fills in the exact date of the commissioner's denial, but it is inferred: 8/13 coverage says the denial came 'Monday', and 8/10/2026 was a Monday. The AG release (8/13) confirms the denial but gives no date. The amended order lists the State's 'Notice of Supplemental Authority Re: Commissioner's Ruling Denying Motion to Stay' among the papers it considered, which puts the ruling before 8/12.
- · Washington State Gambling Commission
Turning point · · King County Superior Court
The judge signed the amended order: geofence by Aug 19 and Sep 2, $120,000 a day if the Sep 2 deadline is missed, and users could still exit positions and withdraw. He also refused to pause it himself.
Primary source: King County Superior Court (Judge John McHale), Aug 12, 2026 · p.13–14
1 step, Aug 18, 2026
- · U.S. District Court, W.D. Wash. (No. 2:26-cv-02579)
OG (North American Derivatives Exchange) and Washington officials filed a stipulation in which the state agreed not to bring enforcement actions against OG's event contracts while related Ninth Circuit appeals are pending.
This gives a primary source for your 8/18 agreement entry.
- · U.S. District Court, W.D. Wash. (No. 2:26-cv-02579)
Turning point · · King County Superior Court
The first deadline: Kalshi started blocking Washington users by IP address and residency.
Primary source: King County Superior Court (Judge John McHale), Aug 12, 2026 · p.13, ll.14–15
2 steps, Aug 20, 2026 to Aug 27, 2026
- · King County Superior Court
Kalshi asked the judge to reconsider, pointing to the state's non-enforcement deal with a competitor, Crypto.com's OG.
Secondary sourceSecondary source
DATE CONFLICT: KOMO, publishing Friday Aug 21, says Kalshi filed "Thursday" (Aug 20); crypto.news calls it "the Aug. 21 motion". The motion itself wasn't located.
- · U.S. District Court, W.D. Wash.
Judge Coughenour signed the stipulated order on enforcement in OG's case, and on 8/31 the case was stayed pending the Ninth Circuit's resolution of related appeals.
- · King County Superior Court
Turning point · · King County Superior Court
The GeoComply deadline: the multi-source geofence was due, with $120,000 a day after it. Whether Kalshi met it hasn't been confirmed.
Primary source: King County Superior Court (Judge John McHale), Aug 12, 2026 · p.13, ll.15–26
2 steps, Sep 16, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026
- · King County Superior Court
The judge refused to reconsider, and the injunction stood.
DATE CONFLICT: PM Pulse says 'Tuesday (9/16)', but 9/16/2026 was a Wednesday. The ruling may be 9/15 or 9/16. Gambling Insider reports the denial (from Daniel Wallach) but gives no date. The order itself wasn't located.
- · Ninth Circuit
Kalshi moved to stay proceedings in its Ninth Circuit appeal of the remand order (No. 26-3106), which is still pending; briefing had been paused on 7/16 until the Ninth Circuit decides the Assad, Nevada/OG and Robinhood appeals.
- · King County Superior Court
Will Kalshi come back in Washington State?
A full Court of Appeals panel, or the Washington Supreme Court, reviews the injunction Secondary source
If Kalshi wins: The injunction could be paused or lifted, and the markets come back while the case continues.
If Washington wins: The markets stay off until the case is decided.
The main case in King County Superior Court Primary source
If Kalshi wins: The block ends.
If Washington wins: A permanent injunction, plus whatever money the court orders (penalties, and possibly the users' losses the state asked for).
Why did a Washington court block Kalshi?
Washington's attorney general sued Kalshi on March 27, 2026 in King County Superior Court, under the state Gambling Act and Consumer Protection Act. Kalshi moved the case to federal court the same day. A federal judge sent it back on May 5, and the Ninth Circuit refused to pause that on May 21 (docket).
On July 20, Judge John McHale granted the state a preliminary injunction. He concluded that "The Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) does not preempt Washington State gambling law" (p.6, l.14), and found that "The State has shown a likelihood that Kalshi's conduct violates multiple provisions of the Washington Gambling Act" (p.11, ll.17-18). Those are findings made to decide whether Kalshi should be blocked while the case goes on. They aren't a final judgment, and the main case is still open.
Federal appeals courts have split on the same preemption question. On April 6, 2026 the Third Circuit ruled for Kalshi against New Jersey, holding that federal commodities law likely preempts state gambling law for its sports contracts. On August 28 the Ninth Circuit, the circuit that covers Washington, ruled for Nevada, holding that sports contracts likely aren't swaps and that federal law likely doesn't preempt Nevada's gaming law. Three petitions now ask the Supreme Court to settle it: Kalshi at the Supreme Court follows them, and is Kalshi gambling? sets out both sides. None of these rulings, the Washington order included, decides how your trades are taxed.
Why does Kalshi say my location is restricted in Washington State?
The order sets the test Kalshi has to apply. By August 19 it had to block by IP address and by residency, and by September 2 through GeoComply, a multi-source location check "designed to prevent anyone located within the geographic boundaries of the State of Washington from purchasing any event contract" in the covered markets (amended order, p.13, ll.14-19).
So the test is where you are, not only where you live: if you are physically in Washington, the seven switched-off categories stay off whatever address your account lists, and residency is a second test the order names. Finance, economics, climate and commodities are outside the order. Crypto is one of Kalshi's tabs the order describes (p.2, ll.21-22), but it is in neither the banned list nor the carve-out, so the order doesn't settle it either way.
Does the Washington order cover Crypto.com, Robinhood and other apps?
The order's operative terms name Kalshi, and they say nothing about Kalshi contracts bought through a broker (amended order, pp.13-14). Other companies offering event contracts in Washington are in cases of their own, and as of September 22, 2026 each stands differently:
- Crypto.com's exchange, OG (North American Derivatives Exchange): on August 18 the state agreed not to bring enforcement actions against OG's event contracts while related Ninth Circuit appeals are pending, and a federal judge signed that as an order on August 27 (docket).
- Robinhood Derivatives sued Washington officials in federal court on March 30 to stop the state enforcing its gambling law against it (docket). On May 21 the state agreed not to bring enforcement actions against "Robinhood's role in transactions involving event contracts traded on a DCM" (a federally registered exchange) until the Ninth Circuit decides the Nevada appeals, and the judge stayed the case (order, p.3, ll.1-8).
- Ludlow Exchange, a Novig affiliate, sued Washington officials on August 6 on the same ground (docket).
Kalshi pointed to the OG agreement when it asked Judge McHale to reconsider around August 20 (crypto.news). He refused in mid-September, and the injunction stands (Law360, September 18, 2026; PM Pulse).
The order doesn't decide how Kalshi trades are taxed. The trades you made before the block, and any position you exit now, still belong on your federal return: how to file Kalshi taxes.
Every other state's status, from the same data: is Kalshi legal in my state?
Kalshi, state by state · as of Sep 22, 2026
Tap a state to see what’s switched off there, what happens to your money, and the order behind it.
- Switched off · 3
- Ordered, on hold · 1
- Being fought · 15
- No action found · 32
- Some categories off
WashingtonSwitched off7 of 12 categories offsince Sep 2, 2026
Seven of Kalshi's twelve categories are switched off, sports and elections among them. The order lets finance, economics, climate and commodities keep trading, and doesn't say whether crypto is covered.
- Withdraw your cash: allowed. Nothing in the order stops you closing your account and withdrawing your cash. Primary source: p.14, ll.24–26
- Close open positions: allowed. Kalshi can't stop you exiting positions you already hold. Primary source: p.13, ll.19–20
- New trades: blocked. No new trades in the seven switched-off categories for anyone located in Washington (GeoComply geofence since Sep 2). Primary source: p.13, ll.14–19
- Deposits: not addressed. The order doesn't say anything about deposits. Primary source
- Money back to users: left open. The state kept the right to seek back fees and losses Washington users took from Sep 2 on. Nothing has been ordered. Primary source: p.13, ll.20–22
Off: Sports, Elections, Politics, Entertainment, Culture, Tech and science, Mentions · Allowed by the order: Finance, Economics, Climate, Commodities
King County Superior Court (Judge John McHale) granted a preliminary injunction on July 20 and signed the amended order on August 12. Kalshi had to geofence by IP and residency by August 19 and through GeoComply by September 2. The order says Kalshi will not stop users exiting positions they already hold, and does not stop Washington users closing their accounts and withdrawing funds. The Court of Appeals refused to pause it, and on September 16 the judge refused to reconsider.
What’s next: Kalshi can still ask a full Court of Appeals panel or the Washington Supreme Court to step in, and the main case continues.
Primary source: King County Superior Court (Judge John McHale), Aug 12, 2026Primary source: Washington Attorney General, Aug 13, 2026
| State | Status | What it means | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan | Switched off (1 of 12 categories off) | Sports contracts are switched off. The order names no other category. | Jun 29, 2026 |
| Nevada | Switched off (3 of 12 categories off) | Sports, election and entertainment contracts are switched off. | Mar 20, 2026 |
| Washington | Switched off (7 of 12 categories off) | Seven of Kalshi's twelve categories are switched off, sports and elections among them. The order lets finance, economics, climate and commodities keep trading, and doesn't say whether crypto is covered. | Sep 2, 2026 |
| Massachusetts | Ordered, on hold | A court ordered sports contracts off, then paused it. You can still trade here. | |
| Arizona | Being fought | Arizona's criminal case against Kalshi is blocked for now. Nothing is switched off. | |
| Connecticut | Being fought | Connecticut has sued. Nothing is switched off yet. | |
| Illinois | Being fought | In court. Nothing is switched off yet. | |
| Iowa | Being fought | Kalshi lost a bid to stop Iowa. Nothing is switched off yet. | |
| Kentucky | Being fought | Kentucky has sued. Nothing is switched off yet. | |
| Maryland | Being fought | In court. Nothing is switched off yet. | |
| Minnesota | Being fought | A state ban was passed, then paused by a federal court. | |
| Missouri | Being fought | A cease-and-desist was sent in September. Nothing is switched off yet. | |
| Montana | Being fought | A cease-and-desist is on hold. Nothing is switched off. | |
| New Jersey | Being fought | Kalshi won here. New Jersey has asked the Supreme Court to step in. | |
| New York | Being fought | New York has sued. Nothing is switched off yet. | |
| Ohio | Being fought | Kalshi lost its bid to stop Ohio. Nothing is switched off yet. | |
| Tennessee | Being fought | Kalshi won the first round. Nothing is switched off. | |
| Utah | Being fought | A federal court ruled for Utah. Nothing is switched off yet. | |
| Wisconsin | Being fought | Wisconsin has sued. Nothing is switched off yet. | |
| Every other state | No action found | Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, Wyoming | |
Kalshi event contracts, state by state. What a court or regulator has actually done, as it stands on the date above. Not legal advice.
Sources for Kalshi in Washington State
- Primary source WSGC news post, 12/9/2025. Cited 1×, checked Sep 23, 2026.
- Primary source W.D. Wash. docket, ECF 1. Cited 2×, checked Sep 23, 2026.
- Primary source W.D. Wash. docket. Cited 3×, checked Sep 23, 2026.
- Primary source PI order (AG-hosted). Our copy. Cited 1×, checked Sep 23, 2026.
- Primary source W.D. Wash. docket, ECF 1-2. Cited 1×, checked Sep 23, 2026.
- Primary source W.D. Wash. docket, ECF 10. Cited 2×, checked Sep 23, 2026.
- Primary source Ninth Cir. docket 26-3106, Dkt. 29-30. Cited 1×, checked Sep 23, 2026.
- Primary source Washington sues online betting platform Kalshi for illegal gambling, Washington Attorney General, Mar 27, 2026. Cited 5×, checked Sep 23, 2026.
- Primary source Robinhood Derivatives v. Griffin, stipulated motion and order concerning enforcement actions (Dkt. 17), U.S. District Court, W.D. Wash. (Judge John C. Coughenour), No. 3:26-cv-05311-JCC, May 21, 2026. Cited 2×, checked Sep 23, 2026.
- Primary source Washington v. KalshiEX, King County Superior Court No. 26-2-10264-3 SEA: Amended and Updated Order Granting Preliminary Injunction (signed 2026-08-12), King County Superior Court (Judge John McHale), No. 26-2-10264-3 SEA, Aug 12, 2026. Our copy. Cited 22×, checked Sep 22, 2026.
- Primary source Judge orders Kalshi cease numerous Washington operations, Washington Attorney General, Aug 13, 2026. Cited 1×, checked Sep 23, 2026.
- Secondary source Law360, 7/27/2026 (secondary). Cited 1×, checked Sep 23, 2026.
- Secondary source PM Pulse 049 (secondary). Cited 1×, checked Sep 23, 2026.
- Secondary source Kalshi brings in former U.S. solicitor general as Washington state gambling case escalates, GeekWire, Aug 10, 2026. Cited 1×, checked Sep 23, 2026.
- Secondary source Kalshi ordered to shut down sports and election prediction markets in Washington state by Sept. 2, GeekWire, Aug 13, 2026. Cited 2×, checked Sep 23, 2026.
- Secondary source Kalshi asks King County judge to reconsider Washington injunction on event contracts, KOMO News, Aug 21, 2026. Cited 1×, checked Sep 23, 2026.
- Secondary source Kalshi blocks Washington users as court fight grows, crypto.news, Aug 23, 2026. Cited 1×, checked Sep 23, 2026.
Questions people ask
Is Kalshi still available in Washington State?
Partly. As of September 22, 2026, Kalshi's finance, economics, climate and commodities markets are still available in Washington State. A King County Superior Court preliminary injunction requires Kalshi to block its sports, elections, politics, entertainment, culture, tech and science, and mentions markets for anyone located in the state, with a final geofencing deadline of September 2, 2026.
Can I withdraw my money from Kalshi in Washington?
Yes. The amended order of August 12, 2026 says: "Nothing in the Order shall prohibit Kalshi from allowing Washington, identified or self-reported consumers to close or deactivate their Kalshi accounts and withdraw funds." It also says Kalshi will not prohibit users from exiting positions they already hold. It says nothing about deposits.
Why is Kalshi banned in Washington?
It isn't banned outright: 7 of Kalshi's 12 market categories are switched off. In a July 20, 2026 preliminary injunction, Judge John McHale of King County Superior Court found that Washington had shown a likelihood that Kalshi's conduct violates the state Gambling Act, and concluded that the federal Commodity Exchange Act does not preempt state gambling law. Those findings are preliminary, and the main case continues.
What happens to the money Washington users lost on Kalshi?
Nothing has been ordered. Washington's lawsuit asks the court to recover money Washington users lost, and the August 12, 2026 amended order reserves the state's right to seek the fees and losses Washington users incurred on or after September 2, 2026.
Will Kalshi come back in Washington?
Only if a court lifts or pauses the order. As of September 22, 2026, Kalshi can still ask a full Court of Appeals panel or the Washington Supreme Court to review the injunction; a win there could bring the markets back while the case continues. If Kalshi wins the main case in King County Superior Court, the block ends.
Does the Washington ruling change how Kalshi trades are taxed?
No. A state court finding that Kalshi likely breaks state gambling law isn't a ruling on how your trades are taxed. Federal tax treatment is a question under the Internal Revenue Code, and no court or IRS guidance has settled it for event contracts.
Keep reading
Is Kalshi Legal in My State? Every State's Status
No state has switched Kalshi off entirely, but courts have switched off some of its markets in a few, and cases are live in over a dozen more.
Is Kalshi Gambling? What the Courts Have Ruled
Two appeals courts split on whether Kalshi's sports contracts are swaps or bets. What each ruled, what state courts found, and why none is a tax ruling.
Kalshi at the Supreme Court: Petitions and Dates
Three petitions ask the Supreme Court whether states can regulate Kalshi's sports contracts. What each asks, the circuit split, and when to expect news.
How to File Kalshi Taxes (2026)
Kalshi's forms and exports cover closed positions only, so they cannot support every filing route, section 1256 included. How to build the rest yourself.
Browse all guides or start from the Prediction Market Tax Center.